月度归档 2025年10月8日

　　At the leaders’ climate summit held a few days ago, US President Biden promised the US government’s emission reduction targets: by 2030, the US greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by 50%-52% compared with 2005, and by 2050, the net emission will be zero.

　　In the past few days, Biden’s promise has become the focus of all parties. However, while the western media praised this as a "huge step forward" for the United States after the Trump administration’s retrogression for four years, they also collectively expressed their concerns and doubts about this "commitment."

　　Question 1: Is the promised emission reduction target reliable?

　　First of all, has the United States really promised its "national independent contribution"?

　　Some American media pointed out that climate change is a cumulative problem. The total amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the United States in history exceeds that of all other countries, and it is these emissions that help the United States become one of the richest countries in the world. Up to now, the per capita emissions of the United States are still the highest in the world, accounting for about 15% of the total global emissions.

　　△ US VOX News Network (VOX) report screenshot

　　What’s more, the United States has not yet entered the track of realizing its last "national independent contribution" commitment, let alone achieving new goals.

　　△ US VOX News Network (VOX) report screenshot

　　Second, can the United States achieve the industrial transformation necessary for these emission reduction targets?

　　Some western media pointed out that Biden’s commitment to reduce emissions by half in the next decade means that the US power, transportation, industry and agricultural systems need to be transformed on a large scale in a short time, but this is very difficult. "It is relatively easy to set goals, which is largely a combination of technical feasibility and political suitability. The arduous task is to complete it. "

　　△ Australian "Dialogue" News Network (the conversation) report screenshot

　　The third and most important uncertainty: whether the domestic political reality in the United States can make Biden’s commitment to reduce emissions be implemented.

　　As the US media said, due to the sharp opposition between the two parties in Congress, the Biden administration can only be vague about how to design its specific path to achieve new emission reduction targets. "This is a political challenge, and it remains to be seen whether Biden has enough political capital to start this process."

　　△ US VOX News Network (VOX) report screenshot

　　Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science at Pennsylvania State University, further believes that in the United States, it is not only difficult to turn emission reduction targets into laws, but also the consistency of government policies, because "anything done by one government through administrative actions can be reversed by the next government".

　　△ Screenshot of American Public Television Network (PBS)

　　Question 2: Can the agreed foreign aid be implemented?

　　According to the Cancun Agreement adopted by the United Nations Climate Conference in 2012, developed countries should provide developing countries with $100 billion in "climate financing" every year by 2020. However, according to the report on climate financing released by the OECD last year, as of 2018, these figures are still far from the level they should be.

　　△ Screenshot of climatechangenews report

　　Among them, the debt owed by the United States is particularly prominent: during the Obama administration, it promised to provide $3 billion to the "Green Climate Fund", but the actual allocation was only $1 billion. Since then, the Trump administration has directly refused to provide follow-up funds. So far, the US government still has $2 billion outstanding.

　　Although Biden plans to provide $1.2 billion to the Green Climate Fund in fiscal year 2022, many climate activists, including the United States, said that the money was not enough to repay the previous $2 billion debt, and the Biden administration should provide more funds to the fund.

　　△ Screenshot of climatechangenews report

　　Alex Lunfner, an activist of the "350 Africa" organization in Johannesburg, South Africa, who is committed to promoting the response to climate change, believes that $1.2 billion is "an insult to countries in the southern part of the world" and "if all the climate damage caused by the United States for many years is added up, the result should be trillions of dollars, not billions of dollars".

　　△ Screenshot of climatechangenews report

　　Brandon Wu from ActionAid USA stressed in a statement that Biden’s promised emission reduction targets and aid amount are far from enough compared with the US’s damage to the climate. As the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in history, the United States has a responsibility to the most vulnerable countries on the front line of the climate crisis.

　　△ Brandon Wu

　　A coalition of 46 environmental groups recently wrote to the White House: "As the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in history, it is both a legal obligation and a moral responsibility for the United States to provide funds for climate action in developing countries."

　　△ Screenshot of inside climate news report

　　Question 3: Is America still worth trusting?

　　Whether it is to implement independent emission reduction targets or fulfill foreign aid commitments, the performance of the United States in the past few years has left a deep negative impression on the world.

　　Can the United States be trusted? In fact, many American media have also questioned this, thinking that the debt owed by the United States in the field of climate change will not be made up by holding a summit and drawing a "pie".

　　Let’s look back at the "plot reversal" frequently staged by recent American governments on climate issues:

　　 　 　 ● In 1997, then President Clinton signed the Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but the US Senate controlled by Republicans never ratified it;

　　 　 　 ● In 2001, then-President George W. Bush announced that the United States would not join the Kyoto Protocol on the grounds that the Kyoto Protocol did not stipulate the compulsory emission reduction obligations of developing countries;

　　 　 　 ● In 2015, then-President Obama signed the landmark Paris Agreement, promising to reduce US emissions by 26% to 28% compared with 2005 by 2025;

　　 　 　 ● In 2017, then President Trump announced his withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and turned to support the fossil fuel policy and the unilateralism of "US priority";

　　 　 　 ● In 2021, after taking office, Biden promised that the United States would return to the Paris Agreement … …

　　△ "Los Angeles Times" report screenshot

　　In Washington post’s view, even if Biden’s government can do a good job of political balance at home, his new commitment to reduce emissions is "just a tool to trick other major economies".

　　△ Washington post report screenshot

　　The New York Times quoted Taiya Smith, a senior researcher at the American Climate Leadership Council, as saying, "It’s hard to really trust the American government. The United States must do a lot of things before countries can restore their confidence in it. The United States must prove that this is not a temporary political interest. "

　　△ The New York Times report screenshot

　　The article in Australia’s "Dialogue" news network believes that the Trump administration’s destruction of global efforts to deal with climate change in the past four years has seriously weakened the credibility of the United States overseas. In view of this, although the White House’s new commitment is bold, "adjectives are still long and credible verbs are still short". It remains to be seen whether this commitment will help convince the world of the United States.

　　△ Australian "Dialogue" News Network (the conversation) report screenshot

　　Planning Wang Jian

　　Written by Shan Lijuan

　　Editor Lin Wei Weng Hai New Li Haixia

　　Qian Shen Hou Chen Wang Jian

　　Producer Guan Juanjuan

　　The reporter learned from the Ministry of Natural Resources today (21st) that the Master Plan of Land and Space of the Yangtze River Delta Ecological Green Integration Development Demonstration Zone (2021— 2035) was officially approved, which provided a basic basis for the planning, construction and governance of the demonstration area.

　　The Yangtze River Delta Ecological Green Integration Development Demonstration Zone covers Qingpu District of Shanghai, Wujiang District of Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province and Jiashan County of Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, covering an area of about 2,413 square kilometers. The "Master Plan" clarifies that the demonstration area will rely on a map of land and space planning to promote cross-regional integrated spatial collaborative governance; Focus on the ecological environment of the three places, jointly build the clear water green corridors of the Taipu River and the Beijing-Hangzhou Canal, and unify the environmental protection discharge standards of the demonstration areas. The collection and treatment rate of urban sewage in the three places should reach 100%.

　　Men Xiaoying, deputy director of the Center for Land and Space Planning and Research of the Ministry of Natural Resources, said in an interview with CCTV reporters at the General Station that the three provinces and cities are now jointly promoting the demonstration area to co-ordinate all kinds of special plans and improve the spatial governance mechanism of regional integration, focusing on the interconnection of infrastructure and the co-construction and sharing of some important public service facilities, such as co-ordinating the rail transit network in the demonstration area and opening up the dead-end roads between provinces to promote the spatial layout of high-level public service facilities.

　　The Master Plan also proposes that the demonstration area will promote green and low-carbon development, take the water town unit where rivers, lakes, fields, towns and villages are integrated as the space carrier, promote the layout optimization of existing land, and strive to expand the blue-green space. By 2035, the water surface rate of rivers and lakes will be no less than 20.6%, the forest coverage rate will be more than 12%, and the proportion of green transportation will increase to 80%.

　　Meng Xiaoying said that in the neighborhood, by arranging some small green spaces, three-dimensional greening, and these composite blue-green spaces, we will build a green and low-carbon neighborhood, and at the same time, we will build such a space carrier to promote the classification and rectification of industrial land, improve quality and efficiency, and build a new way of innovation-driven, efficient and intensive industrial development.

　　The three places jointly adhere to the bottom line of resource security.

　　Optimize the pattern of land spatial development

　　Master Plan of Land and Space of Yangtze River Delta Ecological Green Integration Development Demonstration Zone (2021— 2035), breaking geographical restrictions, requires the three places to strictly abide by the bottom line of resource security and optimize the pattern of land and space development.

　　The Master Plan makes it clear that the demonstration area will strictly abide by the bottom line of resource security, and will not engage in centralized, large-scale and high-intensity development and construction, and will not take the old road of expanding the scale of construction land. On the basis of adhering to the control of the safety bottom line of cultivated land protection, ecological protection and natural and cultural heritage protection, by 2035, the total scale of planned construction land in the demonstration area will be controlled within 803.6 square kilometers, which is 15.7 square kilometers less than the current construction land.

　　Meng Xiaoying emphasized that the three control lines of cultivated land and permanent basic farmland protection line, ecological protection red line and urban development boundary should be regarded as an insurmountable red line for adjusting economic structure, planning industrial development and promoting urban and rural construction to focus on ecological green integration and strictly control development intensity. At the same time, it is strictly forbidden to merge villages at will, build large communities, and carry out large-scale demolition and construction against the wishes of farmers.

　　In terms of optimizing the spatial pattern of land, the demonstration area will build a multi-center, open and green regional integrated spatial layout based on the resource endowment and the characteristics of Jiangnan water towns, expand the ecological space, ensure the agricultural space and optimize the urban space. Meng Xiaoying said that through this plan, the efficiency of space utilization will be gradually improved, for example, some new formats will be better introduced to improve the efficiency of land use, and at the same time, the space will be optimized and integrated, and the space will be laid out as an intensive network space, which is more conducive to the efficiency and coordination of space, rather than the past form of a single-center pie.

　　(CCTV reporter Tan Zhenhua)

The monitoring of terrestrial wildlife organized by Guizhou Forestry Bureau in 2024 showed that the number of sub-adults and larvae of Guizhou golden monkey was large, and the population showed an increasing trend. There are a large number of langurs and the population is relatively stable. This shows that Guizhou province has achieved good results in the protection of rare and endangered wild animals.

The monitoring was started in January 2024, and 240 infrared cameras were deployed, focusing on five rare and endangered species: Guizhou golden monkey, langur monkey, forest musk deer, white-crowned pheasant and Chinese pangolin. The monitoring scope covers the main distribution areas of these species, including 13 monitoring units such as Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, involving 17 counties (districts) of 5 cities (states) in Guizhou, with a monitoring area of 284,234 hectares.

According to preliminary statistics, nearly 200 species of terrestrial wild animals have been found in this monitoring, including 6 species of national first-class protected wild animals and 29 species of national second-class protected wild animals. Through line monitoring and infrared camera technology, precious images of rare and endangered wild animals such as Guizhou golden monkey, langur, forest musk deer and white-crowned pheasant were collected. During the monitoring process, the behaviors such as grooming, surface foraging, breastfeeding and playing of Guizhou golden monkey and langur were photographed many times, and the images of activities and foraging of forest musk deer and white-crowned pheasant were captured for the first time, which enriched the records of these animals’ field behaviors.

As a rare species endemic to China, Guizhou golden monkey is only distributed in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve in the northeast of Guizhou, and is listed as "extremely endangered" in the Red List of Endangered Species of the World Conservation Union, and is called "the only child of the earth".

Every reporter Yang abandoned Fei, every editor Cheng Peng Yang Huan　　　　

Image source: Photo Network _300077260

China is the largest fruit producing area in the world, and it is also a big country of fruit consumption.

Thousands of kilometers from north to south, spanning several temperature zones from cold temperate zone to tropical zone, showing significant regional geographical differences. Rich landforms and temperatures have created rich fruit varieties in China.

Taking tropical fruits as an example, from the point of origin, they are mainly concentrated in Guangdong, Guangxi, Yunnan, Fujian, Hainan andTaiwan Province of ChinaWait for the place. Among them, Guangdong and Guangxi account for 67% of the country’s tropical fruits, followed by Fujian, Yunnan and Hainan. The total area of tropical fruit production in the five provinces accounts for 94% of the whole country.

However, unlikeGuangdong Zengcheng litchi, Xuwen pineapple, Fujian Guanxi honey pomelo, Yongchun citrus and other special brands, the industry pain point of Guangxi fruit lies in brand awareness.Although it was once "out of the circle" because of the title of "fruit kingdom", there is always a lack of famous fruits.

Image source: Every reporter Yang abandoned the photo.

Wang Zaolan, an associate professor at the Institute of Agricultural and Rural Development of Guangxi Academy of Social Sciences, noted that there are 165 geographical indication agricultural products in Guangxi, but even for local people, the awareness is not high. Taking Lingshan litchi as an example, the local people always talk about Zengcheng and Crater litchi, and the brand competitiveness is poor.

The last time Lingshan went out of the circle was because of the hometown of "Wu Zetian’s mother", but it was obviously not a successful attempt. At present, it is not only the key for Guangxi, a big agricultural province, to transform into a strong one, but also a survival proposition for agricultural counties that blossom everywhere in Guangxi.

"You eat litchi in the crater.

May be Lingshan litchi. "

A year ago, when Wu Duoce, the regional manager of South China of Alibaba’s Digital Village Division, came to Lingshan, he saw the image of a "hometown of litchi" with "survival in the cracks"-on the one hand, litchi was regarded as "the treasure of towns and counties" by Lingshan, and the propaganda about litchi was everywhere, and Lingshan and litchi were almost deeply tied; But on the other hand, litchi operators always mention Zengcheng and Hainan litchi. In front of these two pioneers who made a name for themselves in the market early, Lingshan litchi is somewhat "narcissistic".

Lingshan litchi seems to be born with two natural enemies.

Image source: CCTV News

Zengcheng Litchi, located in Guangdong, has Su Shi’s famous phrase "300 Litchi a Day". The reputation of Lingnan Litchi spread like wildfire, and the profound litchi culture gave birth to a variety that hit the high-end market. Hainan litchi, with the help of the big IP of "Hainan", has its own flow, and its geographical position at higher latitude also enables it to take the lead and become the earliest place of production in the litchi season every year.

On the other hand, the yield of Lingshan litchi can be counted as one. The data shows that only in ling shan,uncleThe small litchi fields add up to a total of 420,000 mu, not only far more than 190,000 mu in Zengcheng, but even more than 320,000 mu in Hainan Province.

But the lack of brand support is not necessarily an advantage.

Due to the short production time, litchi is a kind of fruit whose pricing is particularly affected by the market, and the phenomenon of "big and small years" is particularly prominent every year because of its output. On this basis, Wu Duoce pointed out that due to the brand premium, even the same litchi in the same year, different places of origin will cause the price gap of litchi.

Every year, Hainan Litchi, which was first introduced, always marked the market trend with the highest price. Then, Litchi from Guangdong and Guangxi were released one after another, but the price kept falling, especially Lingshan Litchi, and the final price difference with Guangdong Litchi might be as high as 20 yuan/kg.

Under the temptation of huge profits, "over-water" litchi also "came into being". An "open secret" among local litchi practitioners in Lingshan is that many Lingshan lychees have been labeled as producing areas in Guangdong and Hainan, and even went around the local area, and the "value" of litchi after "labeling" has soared.

The victory in quantity may also be "covered up" by shortcomings in other fields.

Before Ali, Sanke Group from Shenzhen, Guangdong Province came to Lingshan first. At that time, the fruit factory was still the basic unit for planting litchi locally. Every year, the dealers went to various fruit factories as "agents" to collect the fruits and then further distributed them to all parts of the country. Lin Haiyin, general manager of Guangdong Sanke Agricultural Science and Technology, said that they saw the vacancy in the integration of Lingshan supply chain and captured the local new wholesale market.

Behind the incomplete supply chain is the scattered production and sales pattern of litchi in Lingshan. Once again, there are not enough loud brands to knead it into a rope, which further aggravates the logistics problem of Lingshan litchi-these small participants are unable to "bargain" with local logistics enterprises, and they even seek a way out through Nanning. The high cost of cold chain logistics reduces the price advantage brought by output. "When a litchi is sold in 70 yuan, logistics alone will occupy 30 yuan".

There is no "fruit" in a big fruit province.

In the fruit competition between different producing areas, brands have already occupied the position of "frontline position".

Japan, which combines agricultural products with the origin with the strategy of "one village, one product", has already enjoyed the dividend brought by brand building. Among them, the most famous one is the evening melon in Hokkaido. Xizhang, which has fallen into bankruptcy due to the depression of mining industry and the failure of investment in film and tourism industry, has spared no effort in brand building of honeydew melons, which not only makes honeydew melons sell at a "sky-high price", but also pushes Xizhang out of the development dilemma.

In China, Liu Yiqiang, Dean of the Institute of Overseas Chinese Township Governance and Rural Revitalization of Jinan University, personally participated in a successful case of brand building. Xuwen county in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province is famous for its rich pineapples, but it is difficult to sell when it is sold every year.

Last year, Xu Wen created the brand topic of "pineapple sea" through independent planning, which not only created more than one billion readings, but also fed back to the market. The purchase price of Xu Wen pineapple set a new record in history and broke the bottleneck of "increasing production without increasing income".

Image source: CCTV News

Guangxi is not unaware of the importance of brand. As early as ten years ago,The local media once pointed out that there is no brand in Guangxi fruit. Fruit farmers not only put into "price war" in exchange for market share, but also fruit merchants are well versed in the "routine" of raising prices by "branding". Guangxi began to go out of Guangxi to hold agricultural products fairs, hoping to enhance the popularity of local fruit brands with the help of government platforms.

But Guangxi is facing a powerful opponent.

Take litchi as an example. Liu Yiqiang pointed out that in order to keep Zengcheng litchi in a certain market scarcity,The local association in Guangdong even intends to limit the planting area of certain types of litchi to achieve the purpose of price protection.

Haikou litchi, on the other hand, has "superior help". In 2018, Ding Hui, who served as the director of the news center of Hunan TV Station (reception desk) and the director of Hainan Radio and Television Station, went to work as the mayor of Haikou. Soon after, a series of brand-building activities were launched for Haikou litchi. Haikou not only holds the Volcano Litchi Festival every year, but also participates in the live broadcast of e-commerce early and enters the live broadcast room of many well-known Hunan Satellite TV hosts.

According to Wu Duoce’s recollection, after three years, the search volume of "Haikou Litchi" has been equal to that of "Hainan Litchi", and there is even a trend of catching up.

This is not as good as people, and Guangxi’s funds are still more limited. Lin Haiyin once mentioned that in the face of tens of millions of brand building costs in Guangdong every year, Lingshan, as a large agricultural county, seems to be somewhat "stretched" in financial investment.

As a "latecomer", can Guangxi use its ingenuity to open up the situation?

If we strip away the appearance of brand problems, the deep problems of agricultural development in Guangxi will be revealed. Wang Zaolan found that Guangxi is not good at introducing large enterprises to invest in promoting local agricultural development, which makes it difficult for Guangxi to play its resource advantage as a "fruit kingdom".

"Whether it is scale, branding or standardization, it is unrealistic to rely on small farmers and cooperatives themselves. It must be driven by leading enterprises to play a role."

This year, Guangxi put forward the working concept of "project is king"; In Lingshan, an industrial development model in which leading enterprises drive small enterprises is taking shape. Both Sanke and Ali are catfish that stir up the development of local agriculture. In Wang Zaolan’s view, this is to play the role of enterprises and promote branding through enterprises, thus enhancing product awareness.

"Is there any way out for an agricultural county?"

The current disadvantage may also turn into an opportunity to build an advantage.

Lin Haiyin recalled that as an enterprise focusing on the infrastructure market, Sanke came to Lingshan a few years ago in response to "Guangdong enterprises entering Guangxi" in order to broaden the business space of enterprises and find new possibilities. After careful research and judgment, they set the first new wholesale market in Lingshan, which is precisely the opportunity in three aspects: First, the market is large enough, and the local population not only ranks first in Qinzhou, but also ranks fourth among counties in Guangxi; Second, the scale of agricultural products is large enough; Third, the government has less finance, so there is a lot of room for infrastructure improvement.

Lingshan is a big agricultural county. In 2021, the GDP of Lingshan was 32.436 billion yuan, of which the primary industry was 8.652 billion yuan, accounting for 26.7%, even exceeding the secondary industry’s 5.386 billion yuan.

Image source: official website, ling shan Municipal Government

Li Haizhou, deputy director of ling shan Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau, described Lingshan agriculture with several "hometown".In addition to "the hometown of litchi", Lingshan is also the hometown of water cows, tea and freshwater fish seedlings. The four industries it represents, together with fruit seedlings, fragrant chickens and magnolia flowers, are sorted into seven major industries of Lingshan agriculture.

Lingshan is not short of products that can shake the market. Not only litchi, Li Haizhou teased that the output of jasmine used for tea in Lingshan ranks first in Guangxi, but its branding level is poor. The Jasmine Festival in Hengxian next door has gradually become a well-known "Jasmine Capital", and many of them are made by Lingshan as a "wedding dress".

Ali is also hoping for a breakthrough from Lingshan. According to Wu Duoce, they chose Lingshan as the first landing county of the full-link digital agricultural project. In a sense, it is precisely because there are fewer leading enterprises in Lingshan, and the policies and funds are more concentrated, which is conducive to their exploration. They brought digital orchards, intelligent warehouses and digital sales channels to Lingshan, hoping to spread them to more agricultural counties across the country from here.

This is a development path that starts from the first production and serves the first production, but jumps out of the first production. In the digital orchard, a series of agricultural digital systems based on Alot equipment, Internet of Things and integration of water and fertilizer have liberated people from all kinds of planting activities in the fields, behind which is a complete set of agricultural industrialization and standardized production ideas.

The intelligent warehouse with an area of more than 5,000 square meters is intended to gather more companies and farmers engaged in agriculture. On the one hand, it lays a foundation for building a unified brand of Lingshan agricultural products. On the other hand, it also hopes to "concentrate on doing big things", optimize the local logistics ecology with greater bargaining power, and regain the "initiative" of logistics from supply chain centers such as Nanning.

In Liu Yiqiang’s view, the lower land use cost makes it easier for Guangxi to realize the project landing than Guangdong and Hainan. As for Lingshan, a big agricultural county, Wang Zaolan believes that it is unrealistic to develop rural areas and promote county economy only by agriculture, and it needs to further extend the industrial chain and tap the integration of agriculture and other industries. And logistics is a feasible direction.

Is there any way out for a county town that focuses on agriculture? This problem, which puzzles Lingshan and many agricultural counties, may get a new solution in Guangxi, where the industrial integration foundation is weak.

Reporter |Yang abandoned Fei

Edit |Du Hengfeng Du Bo, Yang Huan City, Cheng Peng

Proofread |Duan Lian

Cover image source: Every reporter Yang abandoned the photo

| national business daily  nbdnews  Original article |

Reprinting, editing, copying and mirroring are prohibited without permission.

　　Cctv newsOn August 28th, Henan Province held a press conference to speed up post-disaster reconstruction. It was reported at the meeting that since the disaster occurred, Zhoukou quickly launched an emergency plan, focusing on four aspects: "restoring production and living order, emergency relief and operation, and disaster prevention and mitigation."

　　First, focus on emergency protection and smoothness, and speed up the rush of water to destroy damaged facilities.After the disaster occurred, a disaster tracking and monitoring mechanism was established immediately, and personnel were organized to conduct a thorough investigation of the water-damaged projects. Through the provincial development and reform project dispatching system, 250 damaged projects in the affected areas were investigated, covering farmland water conservancy, roads and bridges, municipal engineering, social livelihood, energy logistics and other fields. Combined with the investigation, a major project library for post-disaster reconstruction was established. At the same time, emergency repair and rescue operations were launched to speed up the reconstruction of water-damaged projects, and 80% of important transportation, electricity, communication and gas were restored within 10 days.

　　The second is to actively promote post-disaster reconstruction around restoring production and life.In order to effectively promote post-disaster reconstruction, the Work Plan for Post-flood Recovery and Reconstruction in Zhoukou City was formulated. According to the principle of "people’s livelihood first, emergency first, overall consideration, safety first, ecological protection and step-by-step implementation", all municipal facilities, infrastructure and public service facilities were repaired and rushed within one month to ensure the basic production and living needs of the affected people. Complete the reinforcement and functional restoration of public service facilities such as hospitals and schools within 3 months to restore normal production and living order; Within one year, the basic production and living conditions and economic and social development in the affected areas will be restored to the pre-disaster level.

　　The third is to plan a number of major projects around improving disaster prevention and mitigation capabilities.In this major flood disaster, Fugou, Xihua, Huangpan and Chuanhui have exposed some outstanding problems to varying degrees: for example, the dike project in Jia Luhe is weak and the flood discharge capacity is low; For example, some bridges and culverts have been in disrepair for a long time, and there are many security risks; For another example, the sluice gate of the canal control gate is not perfect, and the flood and rainwater regulation is not smooth, and so on. In view of the shortcomings exposed in these places, we should draw inferences from one to the other, comprehensively plan and plan systematically, focusing on water conservancy and flood control, urban flood control, road security, and telecommunications security, and plan and reserve a number of major projects to improve the ability of emergency disaster reduction and prevention. Up to now, 347 post-disaster reconstruction and disaster prevention and mitigation capacity improvement projects have been planned, with a total investment of 25.386 billion yuan.

　　The fourth is to strengthen the guarantee of essential services around the construction of emergency disaster prevention projects.A "green channel" for post-disaster reconstruction and disaster prevention and mitigation projects has been opened, and minimal examination and approval has been implemented by simplifying processes, compressing materials, and merging declarations. Since July 20, a total of 315 investment examination and approval, approval and filing items have been handled online. In the next step, Zhoukou will thoroughly implement the spirit of the provincial post-disaster reconstruction work conference, adhere to the principle of "elements follow the project, services follow the project", coordinate financial funds, special bond funds, superior subsidy funds and charitable donation funds, strengthen the protection of land, energy consumption, environmental capacity and other factors, make full efforts to provide service guarantee for project construction, and make due contributions to accelerating post-disaster recovery and reconstruction and promoting stable economic operation.